SHOULD OBAMA FACE JAIL-TIME FOR ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPING TRUMP?
The Department of Justice has acknowledged in a court
filing no evidence of any wiretaps on Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign,
directly contradicting a claim President Trump made in March. The Justice
Department filed a motion Friday evening acknowledging that it didn’t have any
evidence to back up the president’s assertion.
The motion was filed in response to a Freedom of
Information Act lawsuit from the transparency group American Oversight. It
found that neither the National Security Division or the FBI had any records of
wiretapping that President Trump alleged.
“The FBI and Department of Justice have now sided
with former [FBI Director James] Comey and confirmed in writing that President
Trump lied when he tweeted that former President Obama ‘wiretapped’ him at
Trump Tower,” the group said.
President Trump tweeted on March 4 that he “just
found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the
victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!”
I’d bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of
the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to
Election! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2017 Former FBI
Director James Comey, who Trump fired in May, testified before Congress that
the FBI did not wiretap Trump Tower during the campaign.
“Neither President Obama nor any White House official
ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen,” spokesman Kevin Lewis said in
response to the initial tweets.
The White House has responded that Trump was
referring to surveillance in general and the White House has pointed to reports
that indicate there were surveillance efforts against Trump before he took
office. DOJ noted in the motion that FBI and the DOJ can’t “confirm or deny the
existence of any other responsive records” beyond the wiretaps.
The DOJ also noted it neither confirms nor denies the
existence of other records related to the “wiretap” portion of the lawsuit
because “merely acknowledging whether or not responsive records exist would
itself cause harms protected against by FOIA exemptions.”
Comments
Post a Comment